The table below gives iThe graph provides a comparison between town A and town B in the proportion of employees in 3 separate categories in 1960 and 2010.
The graph provides a comparison between town A and town B in the proportion of employees in 3 separate categories in 1960 and 2010.
At first glance, sales in town A was no longer the dominant sector through 50 years started in 1960, whilst, that of town B still stayed at the highest point among 3 categories.
In 1960, both town A and town B had the largest percentage of sales and the lowest manufacturing rates. In particular, town B accounted for 72% of sales meanwhile, the figure of that in town A was 41%. Conversely, town A had 29% of manufacturing which was over 3,5 times more than that in town B, with only 8%. The second-ranking sector was the services respectively 30% and 20%.
After half a century, sales were no more prevalent in town A with only 20% whilst the opposite pattern could be seen that in town B, sales still remained at the top with 54% notwithstanding the significant downturn compared to the year 1960. In 2010, 2 towns experienced a sharp upsurge in manufacturing, especially, it became the sector with the highest rate in town A with 64% while it was the second-ranking in town B with 24%. For the noteworthy development of manufacturing, services stood at the bottom of the rank in both towns with only 16% and 22% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-27 | lamphuongta | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, second, so, still, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60619469027 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.019894486 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508849557522 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9628283805 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348043670402 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194527770084 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.220857515072 0.0843802449381 262% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323883521811 0.15604864568 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.275913082801 0.0819641961636 337% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.