The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992, 2002 and 2012.
The table illustrates the weekly food consumption of people in a particular European country in three years (1992, 2002, and 2012).
In general, it is clear that people the consumption of vegetables was the largest while the opposite was true of cheese.
In 1992, the number of vegetables that people consumed was in the first rank at 2140 grams, followed by the figure for meat at 1148 grams. The data for wheat and bean was 837 and 532 grams, respectively. The figure for cheese was the lowest at 113 grams.
In terms of vegetables, there was a slight rise between 2140 grams in 1992 and 2220 grams in 2012. Similarly, the consumption of wheat and bear also increased modestly from 837 and 532 grams in 1992 to 977 and 590 grams in 2012, respectively. Furthermore, there was a slight increase in the amount of cheese from 113 in 1992 to 125 in 2002, before remaining unchanged in the final year. In contrast, the figure for meat witnessed a drop between 1148 in 1992 and 1132 grams in 2012.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002 67
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 61
- The chart below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, similarly, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59550561798 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5440445369 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483146067416 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5329842118 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8888888889 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211659952511 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10277915492 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146327836096 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175923874522 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.195227415733 0.0819641961636 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.