The table below shows the amount of waste producti( in millions of tonnes) in six different cuntries over a twenty- year period.
The given table illustrates the amount of waste output in various countries during a period of 2 decades starting from 1990 to 2000.
It can be seen from the table, in each of three years, the US produced more waste than Ireland, Japan, Korea, Poland, and Portugal combined. It is also noticeable that Korea is the only country that managed to reduce its waste production by the year 2000.
As is observed from the table, between 1980 and 1990, the amount of waste output in US increased from 131 to 192 million tonnes, and rising trends were true for Japan, Poland, and Portugal. The waste production of Japan rose from 28 to 32 million tonnes during a ten- year period starting from 1980 to 1990, while Poland and Portugal saw waste production go up from 4 to 5 million tonnes and 2 to 3 million tonnes respectively.
Looking the table in more detail, the trends for Ireland and Korea were noticeably different from those described above. The amount of waste output grew more than eightfold, from only 0.6 million tonnes in 1980 to 5 million tonnes in 2000. Korea, by contrast, cut its waste production by 12 million tonnes between 1980 to 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-25 | thuyminhptm | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the popuation aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 73
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system 56
- Today s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 73
- Some people think that youngsters should get involved in unpaid work while others oppose as it may affect their career Discuss both the sides and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include and relevant examples 73
- The table below shows the amount of waste producti in millions of tonnes in six different cuntries over a twenty year period 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ds for Ireland and Korea were noticeably different from those described above. Th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67980295567 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37883604488 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48275862069 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9492769686 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242644011342 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124784742434 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667741511918 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161214609243 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568740094052 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.