the table below shows the amount of waste production in six different countries over a twenty-year period
The table compares the amount of waste discharged in six nations from 1980 to 2000
Overall, all countries witnessed an upward trend in their waste production, with the exception of Korea. Remarkably, throughout the period, the US was always the number one country in terms of waste, while the least of this was reported in Portugal
In 1980, America had the highest amount of waste with 131 million tonnes, followed by Japan with a much lower figure, 28 million. The remaining countries’ figures just stayed below 5 and the one for Korea had not seen until 1990 when its data was first reported with 31 million tonnes and nearly even that of Japan ( 32 million ). Also, in the same year, Ireland’s figure was missing and the amount of waste in the US rose to 151 million, which was 20 million higher than itself in 1980 and 5 times as much as all other figures in the same year
In terms of the waste production of all six nations in 2000, Ireland and Portugal were the cleanest with only 5 million tonnes of waste. Korea also managed to reduce its waste with an over 10 million decrease to 19 million tonnes. On the other hand, America still remained its first position with an increase to 192 million tonnes
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-14 | uyenmia | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | uyenmia | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-13 | quytnee | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-20 | thuphuong2302 | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | buiminhduc | 67 | view |
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees while others have free entry Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The diagram illustrates how plastic bottles are recycled Overall the recycling of 90
- The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...upward trend in their waste production, with the exception of Korea. Remarkably, throughout the perio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion tonnes and nearly even that of Japan 32 million . Also, in the same year, Ire...
^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nd nearly even that of Japan 32 million . Also, in the same year, Ireland’s figur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63133640553 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28882535116 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566820276498 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.6668165466 43.030603864 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.5 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.1666666667 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186294111915 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952597354123 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649792779465 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131034321994 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490444089942 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.32 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.