The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.
The maps illustrate the differences between a school layout as it was in 2004 and its projection to redesign in 2024
Overall, the school is expected to have another school building as well as a new car park in the future. Moreover, the school plans to remain every facility in the past but alterations in their size will occur
In 2004, the school was opened for 600 students while this number is forecasted to rise to 1000 in 2024. There were two school buildings erected opposite each other by a path which make access to a sports field from the main entrance. However, many shifts are predicted to take place in this school site in the next 20 years.
School building 1 and 2 will be connected, leading to a reduction in size of the path. The sports field is projected to be relocated to the southeast of the map, leaving place for the third school building. Also, a second car park will be constructed, which will be joined with the main entrance through a new road
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-10 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-10 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
- The line graph shows TV news viewing figures over a one year period Write a report of at least 150 words summarizing the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
- In the future it seems more difficult to live on Earth Some people think more money should be spent researching other planets such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980s and 2010s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The diagram below shows the stages and equiment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54802259887 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45188627496 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598870056497 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4851776938 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299240081366 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131191932841 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805669767113 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17835441811 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058910803445 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.