The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024.
The diagrams illustrate the layout of a school in 2004 and proposed changes to the school site in the year 2024.
It is clear that there were significant changes in the layout of the school, with an additional building and a second car park. With the expansion, the school is expected to accommodate more students considerably in the future.
Looking at the layout of the school in 2004, we can see that there were two school buildings in the middle of the site, and a path from main entrance to sports field situated between them. In the proposed plan, the two original buildings will be remained and a bridge will be constructed to link the buildings. Notably, there will be a new school building in 2024, and this school can accommodate up to 1000 students compared to 600 students in 2004.
As the third building and the second car park are expected to locate at the position of sports field, so this area will be reduced in size and moved to the south. Finally, a new road will be built to join the two car parks together, and there will be no change in the main entrance and the original car park.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-10 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-10 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the make information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4900990099 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44139725301 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475247524752 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.734516547 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280223035355 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153396823612 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165781423007 0.0843802449381 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236129104966 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.195493580568 0.0819641961636 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.