The table below shows the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
Write at least 150 Words.
The bar chart illustrates the estimated oil capacity of six countries, in millions of barrels per day, from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, Saudi Arabia tops in all the years for the production of oil. There has always been an increase in the manufacturing of the oil from 1990 to 2010. There is a dramatic increase from almost 12.3 million in 2005 to 14.5 million in 2010.Qatar places itself in the last in creation of oil. There production has been consistently the same from 1990 to 2010 ranging between 0-2 million. There has been a slight surge in 2000.
When compared to other nations Iraq significantly rises its level. They were maintaining their rate till 2005 between 0-2.3 million which had a peak in 2010.Kuwait has the production somewhat similar to Iraq in the years 2000 and 2005.This also had a gradual development in 2010.
Iran was managing a standard between 0-4 million till 2005 which had a slight increment in 2010. On the other hand, UAE consistently places itself in a higher position. It is very clear that every country expect Qatar has developed itself in contrast to other years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | yeu192 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | SylviaMazhiqian | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | astrlw@hotmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | Sergei_Bykov | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | mhfezer | 73 | view |
- Should wealthy nations be required to share theirwealth among poorer nations by providing such thingsas food and education? Or us it the responsibility ofthe governments of poorer nations to look after theircitizens themselves 56
- 5.The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relev 67
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016. 78
- There is a good deal of evidence that increasing car use is contributing to global warming and having other undesirable effects on people’s health and well-being.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Qatar
...million in 2005 to 14.5 million in 2010.Qatar places itself in the last in creation o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ere has been a slight surge in 2000. When compared to other nations Iraq signific...
^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kuwait
... 0-2.3 million which had a peak in 2010.Kuwait has the production somewhat similar to ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ilar to Iraq in the years 2000 and 2005.This also had a gradual development in 2010....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86842105263 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61902796457 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568421052632 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.101310863 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0909090909 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203434676849 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850301040009 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113574440076 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1606259503 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149336985043 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.