As can be seen from the chart, while the number of offenders was the largest in early stage, the majority of imprisonment lived in United Stated in over the period shown.
Initially in 1930, 120 thousand offender of imprisonment in Canada accounted for the most popular in different countries. Whereas, the number of imprisonment in New Zealand was 100 thousand, that as well as in united states. In Great Britain was decreased By nearly 30 thousand compare with in Australia (It accounted for approximately 70 thousand). Accounting to 1940, the figure for imprisonment in United Stated increased to reach at roughly 130 thousand, follow by nearly 110 thousand in Canada. In Australia and New Zealand have decreased significantly at nearly 50 thousand, nearly doubling the trend of Britain. Over ten years later, the confinement in Great Britain, Australia and New Zealand were a drop to fluctuate from 40 thousand to nearly 50 thousand while the trend of Canada reached at roughly 120. In 1960, those of four countries increased by about 10 thousand, excepting Canada went down by nearly 100 thousand.
In 1970, the confinement in Great Britain, Australia and New Zealand as same as the figure of 70 thousand. Nevertheless, in 1980 confining of Australia decreased in 50 thousand.
- Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment. Some others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 61
- The chart shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000. 11
- The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980. 67
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003, 2006 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11428571429 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90849097091 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.996470405 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0975816321249 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529279065751 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432516830742 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629250788212 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211319378643 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.