The bar chart compares six different region, namely developed countries, Latin America/ Caribbean, East Asia/ Oceania, Sub-Saharan Africa, Arab states and South Asia in term of the proportion of male and female who did not know reading and writing in 2010.
As can be seen from the chart, the percentage of illiteracy in women was much higher than men, while the majority of illiteracy rates have more popular in south Asia over the period shown.
There was rarely unlettered in developed countries in both genders from approximately 1% to 2%. The trend was true stability at 10% in Latin America/ Caribbean countries.
In contrast, the figure of analphabetic in female was higher, compared to male increased significantly to approximately 20% at the other four countries: East Asia/ Oceania, Sub-Saharan Africa, Arab states and South Asia. The percentage of illiteracy in South Asia went up to reach at over 30%, roughly 50% which broken down male and female respectively.
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 61
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 56
- The chart below shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 11
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think that this is a positive or negative development? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'region' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'regions'.
Suggestion: regions
The bar chart compares six different region, namely developed countries, Latin Amer...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20886075949 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84143382723 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8291137888 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.166666667 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0547836725323 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286631460615 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287971859244 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0382294781876 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024397776233 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.