The table below shows information about three different types of restaurants.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table compares the Sit-down Restarant, Cafeteria and Fast Food Restaurant in various categories.
From an overall perspective, it is noticeable that the Sit-Down restaurant has the highest cost per meal and highest average eating section, while Fast Food Restuarant saw the lowest numbers in all factors, contradict with the other two.
The average amount that people have to spend for lunch at a Sit-Down restaurant is $10.00, doubled the amount at a Fast Food store, which is only $4.50. The difference is even greater for dinner, with Sit-Down restaurant costs three time more than Fast Food chain, averaging $17.00 in contrast with a measly $5.00 of a Fast Food stall. This may comes down to various factors like the complexity of the dishes on the menu. Sit-Down restaurants aim for the best experience for customer, on the other hand, Fast Food Restaurant’s goal is just to serve the food as fast as possible.
Duration of the dining section followed the same trend. Lunch at a Sit-Down restaurant will be two time longer than at a Fast Food Restaurant (45 mins to 20 mins). In addition, dining at a Sit-Down Restaurant will take 3 time longer than at a Fast Food Restaurant (60 mins to 20 mins). This is also influenced by the different aims of each type of restaurant and the purpose of the customer. If time is not an issue, then Sit-Down Restaurant will provide an exceptional experience, otherwise, Fast Food Restaurant will be the optimal choice.
- The diagram shows the small scale production of smoked fish 84
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows information about three different types of restaurants Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, then, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.872 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71164599459 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4806615702 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.727272727 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0799448900093 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432776063246 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319539934008 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0558581223932 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227716500057 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.