The table below shows the mom that expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
Australian dollar per month
1991 2001
Food 155. 160
Electricity and water 75. 120
Clothing 30. 20
Housing 95. 100
Transport 70. 45
Other goods and services 250. 270
Total 675. 715
The table shows changes in the spending patterns of an average Australian household between 1991 and 2001. In general, Australian household spending was high in 2001 than in 1991 but the difference was not significant.
The amount of monthly spending on electricity and water saw a dramatic increase over the 10 year period from $75 to $120. Yet in terms of the expenditure on non-essential goods and services, the rising trend was less obvious with a minor increase of $20. At the time, the amount of money spent on food and housing rose only slightly from $155 to $160 and $95 to $100 respectively.
However, there was a decrease in expenditure on the other two items. Australians spent one third less on clothing, which fell from $30 to $20. Similarly, expenditure on transport dropped from $70 in 1991 to $45 in 2001.
It seems that food and other goods and services were the two biggest items of expenditure. Altogether, they accounted for more than half of the total household spending. By comparison, Australian spent little on dressing up.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-07 | shailipatel | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the mom that expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant Australian dollar per month 1991 2001 Food 155 160 El 78
- The table shows the proportion of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table shows the proportion of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table shows the proportion of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the difference was not significant. The amount of monthly spending on ele...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 55 to 60 and 5 to 00 respectively. However, there was a decrease in expendi...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dropped from 0 in 1991 to 5 in 2001. It seems that food and other goods and s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81460674157 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8967471058 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589887640449 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1209075662 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.9090909091 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1818181818 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22532860662 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877110120103 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943423343166 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135217861474 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095042316012 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.