The table gives information about the manufacture of cars in Argentina, Australia and Thailand during the six years period between 2003 and 2009.
As can be seen from the chart, despite of insignificant decrease in the last two years, the majority of car production was made in Thailand and Argentina was the lowest comparison in three countries.
In 2003, the largest cars were produced in Thailand at 700,000 cars while Argentina accounted for 4000,000 cars, doubling the figure of Australia was just only 200,000 cars. In the next two years, the car manufacture in Thailand increased and peaked at 1,119,000 cars; however, Argentina decreased significantly by 200,000 cars. The opposite was true for Australia which rose at 400,000 cars.
Nevertheless, in 2009, Thailand was a slight decrease to 999,000 cars and Argentina went down to 161,000 cars. In contrast, the number of cars in Australian continued to show the rise of 600,000 cars.
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 73
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people.To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment. Some others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003, 2006 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behaviour while others say the amount of time children they spend watching Tv influences their behavior 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2091503268 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79452850245 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581699346405 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5700549239 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.857142857 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123964938367 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733046384151 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512152540301 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100100904762 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422683995727 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.