The table illustrates the increase in visitors to Ashdown Museum after the refurbishment and the charts provide information on the satisfaction level of the visitors in each of the year before and after the refurbishment.
Overall, there has been an increase in the number of visits to the museum after it was reconstructed. The number of people who were very satisfied with the tour of the museum has increased by a significant amount after the renovation whereas, the dissatisfied visitors decreased by a large amount.
To begin, the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum increased by 18000 in the year after the reconstruction. In the year prior to the refurbishment, most of the people about 40% were dissatisfied with their visit. On the contrary, 30% of the people voted on being satisfied with their visit. In comparison, only 25% people felt extremely about their experience with 10% being very disappointed and 15% being very happy with their visits. And the rest 5% had no response when asked about their experience of the tour to the museum.
On the other hand, most of the visitors (75%) from the year after the renovation was happy with their visit, with 40% being satisfied and 35% being very satisfied. In comparison, only 15% of the people felt disappointed and 5% people had a very dissatisfactory experience. But, the people with no response stayed constant over the years at 5%.
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 67
- Inspite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 61
- International travel and tourism has become easier and more affordable Is this a positive or a negative development 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95744680851 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93375170206 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425531914894 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5703058658 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.909090909 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332339515778 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148791716028 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885703597545 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234323522458 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541148238423 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.