the table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after it was refurbished. the charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table depicts the number of tourists to Ashdown museum a year before and after refurbishment. The pie charts elucidate about the result of surveys of satisfaction rate after visiting museum during the same aforesaid period.
First of all, it can be seen that the number of visitors increased after the completion of reconstruction. Interestingly, the data indicates that three-quarters visitors satisfied just a year after refurbishment.
After refurbishment, a number of tourists have peaked by 18000. In contrast, about 50% visitors were dissatisfied before a year although it has declined up to just 20% after refurbishment. On the other hand, a number of satisfied tourists have enhanced from 45% to 75% after the implementation of refurbishment. Also, the percentage of very dissatisfied has reduced by 5% while the category of no response remained same in both said years.
Laconically, it is demonstrated that refurbishment has affected a lot to increase visitors and satisfaction rate as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-23 | the_prisoner | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | the_prisoner | 67 | view |
| 2017-03-23 | hs2mann | 73 | view |
- the table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after it was refurbished. the charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 73
- All education primary secondary and further education should be free to all people and paid for by the government Do you agree or disagree with this statement 63
- In future natural resource such as coal and oil will be used up How can we reduce their depletion What are the alternative sources of energy available 89
- You have recently gone to live in a new city.Write a letter to your English-speaking friend. In your letter:• Explain why you have gone to live in the new city• Describe the place where you are living• Invite your friend to come and see you 73
- Some people prefer to live in a house while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared to an apartment 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... after refurbishment. On the other hand, a number of satisfied tourists have enha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, well, while, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47770700637 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4763068505 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.8668406654 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316122071663 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131042953178 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816821553972 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188528737857 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109500358758 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.