The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods Summari

Essay topics:

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the quantities of people visiting Ashdown Museum both the previous and the following year of its redevelopment. Meanwhile, the pie charts provide survey results in terms of the visitors’ satisfaction in the two given years.
Overall, there was an increase in the number of visitors during the period, whereas the responses after the renovation were much more positive compared to the previous year.
Regarding the table, it is noticeable that the museum underwent a huge increase in the number of visitors with 92000 turn ups in the year following the refurbishment, surpassing the former figure of just 74000.
With regards to the pie charts, a majority of visitors (40%) confirmed to be dissatisfied with their experiences in the year before the redevelopment. However, this same feature showed evidence of a significant decline to only 15% in the year after the renovation took place. Moreover, 40% of visitors feel satisfied in the year after refurbishment, topping the chart with 10% higher than that of the previous year. The proportion of those who were extremely pleased with the service doubled from 15% to more than 30% during the period. Finally, the rate of dissatisfied responses was cut by half to 5%, while the percentage of no response visitors recorded the same figure in both years surveyed with only 5%.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 67 view
2023-07-25 wfc 89 view
Essays by user huuanhtruong :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'turn' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'turns'.
Suggestion: turns
...se in the number of visitors with 92000 turn ups in the year following the refurbish...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, regarding, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15454545455 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88081427883 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554545454545 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7860684976 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458087271174 0.215688989381 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171929174126 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436560809015 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246350895175 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747015805872 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.