The table illustrates the number of people who visited Ashdown Museum in two separate periods, before and after refurbishment. Additionally, the pie charts provide the level of visitors' satisfaction over the two periods surveyed.
Overall, it is clear that the total number of visitors increased significantly after the museum was refurbished. Moreover, the number of visitors who were dissatisfied with their visit was taken over by that of whom were satisfied.
There were 74000 visitors coming to Ashdown Museum during the year before its refurbishment; however, the number of visitors experienced a great increase of nearly 20000 people after the museum was renovated.
During the year before renovation, 40% of people visiting the museum felt dissatisfied, 10% higher than those found it satisfied; however, the figure for dissatisfied visitors dropped significantly to just 15%, while that of satisfied people increased considerately to 40% during the year after refurbishment. Meanwhile, the number of people felt very dissatisfied with their visit saw a small drop of 5% over the two periods; whereas the figure for those experiencing the great satisfaction rose to 35%. Finally, only 5% of visitors had no interest in answering the survey over the periods shown.
- The diagram shows the parts of a coffee maker 77
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- Many parents complain that computer games have no value to their children’s studies. On the contrary, those online games have produced a lot of negative effects on their mental development. What is your opinion? 73
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51269035533 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04332395773 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.666953249 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.75 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426887088623 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193457009586 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806516806099 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283431405279 0.15604864568 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330375693977 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.