Topic: The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Thanks to the development of technology that the use of mobile phones has increased significantly in recent decades. Although this up-to-date device causes as many adverse social impacts as smoking, it should not be banned in public places for many reasons.
The motive why mobile phones should not be permitted in various places is that it provides sustainable benefits. First, a cell phone is a means of telecommunication. Without it, people cannot keep in touch with their families, peers or even their long-distance relationship. Indeed, a mobile phone is also an essential tool for human’s business. Online transportation services like Grab, Uber, Go Jek and the like cannot survive if there is no use of this technological tool. Moreover, users experience great benefits from updated apps from mobile phones as well. There are numerous entertainment services, online learning apps or also useful gadgets which are free or just cost a few bucks. Hardly can a busy manager remember all of his tasks or appointments without the help from his phone’s reminding app. Therefore, a mobile phone is an important device in human life which should be allowed to use in almost every place.
Admittedly, it could be said that smoking causes more harm than mobile phones. Smoking not only has adverse effects on the person who smokes but also has bad influences on surrounding people, especially pregnant women and children. As a result, smokers and secondhand ones can have lung cancer or throat cancer after a long period. However, there is no harm in using mobile phones. In fact, users can choose to use their device or not since they can turn it off or just disconnect to the Internet connection.
In conclusion, the idea of banning mobile phones should not be implemented because they are not as detrimental to society as smoking. People should use mobile phones wisely to make use off at their useful function.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-08 | mifas meleraroth | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 78
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980- 2010 73
- The process shows diamonds moving from the mine to the retailer 85
- The table below gives information on average hours and minutes spent by UK males and females on different daily activities. 84
- The pie charts below show the causes the diseases in developing and developed countries 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07570977918 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83799837771 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586750788644 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7019593257 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.3888888889 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369150453206 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115437811211 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885430321647 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242408407596 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938976190569 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.