Nowadays, mobile phone become a part of life for people, they can skip a meal but mobile phone cannot; the situation grown to that extent. Some people argues that mobile phones are as dangerous as smoking and hence to be banned as smoking; I have a mixed response for this proposal and I will tend to disagree with ban ning mobiles.
Last decades witnessed an exponential growth in communication; invention of mobile phone was a major among them. mobiles enables us to communicate with people all over the world; besides latest smart phones have more features like vedio call and internet facilities. People can get updated news, chat with friends, do shopping online and even order food, these benefits makes mobile people's best friend.
On the otherhand, people become addicted to mobile as they are using contineously in Internet games social media and so on. This will reduce productivity and make the people inert and will affect the health. Like smoking it will influence the pupil if they are using in classrooms or the people will loose concentration while driving if they use this device. The situation needs concentration it is better to avoid mobile phones; in addition high security areas also restricting mobile use for security purposes. Eventhough, moblies can't be considered as dangerous as smoking it will pose threat in some situations.
In a nutshell, mobile phones should be used wisely and with restriction according to situation al needs. Banning mobile phones will not be a good action as it will affect one of the basic right to communicate; so people should be aware of their social obligation while using mobile phones.
- the charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. 11
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 84
- the diagram below shows the life cycle of a frogsummarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 70
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 67
- Some people believe that we should not study history as it has little or nothing to tell us.Do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Mobiles
...of mobile phone was a major among them. mobiles enables us to communicate with people a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'besides the latest'.
Suggestion: besides the latest
...unicate with people all over the world; besides latest smart phones have more features like ve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to mobile as they are using contineously in Internet games social media and so on...
^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... using in classrooms or the people will loose concentration while driving if they use...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... security purposes. Eventhough, moblies cant be considered as dangerous as smoking i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02554744526 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61731764287 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591240875912 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6754373819 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356001366803 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134326820371 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883952272918 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238106978265 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986983813253 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.