Given pie charts compares the cost of households in five categories in two Asian countries in 2010. Other goods and services contributed the major share in Malaysia while housing stood first priority in Japan.
Firstly, Other goods and services and food contributed more than half of the total expence in Malaysia whereas in Japan housing itself accounted more than one third of total cost. Health sector was the lowest in both Malaysia and Japan with 3 and 6 percentage respectively.
Secondly, transportation facilities took the second lowest expenditure in Malaysia with only 10%, on the otherhand Japanese spend double amount for the same. Housing costs of Japan was very less compared to Malaysia.
Overall, housing, food and other sectors contributed the major share in both countries incontrast, health sector and transportation were the least prioritised .
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people believe that when designing a building, the most important thing to be considered is the function rather than the outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature and history of their own country, rather than the literature and history of other countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 22
- task 1 the table below gives information on participation in various leisure activities 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ransportation were the least prioritised .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, second, secondly, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 732.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 135.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42222222222 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.4086580994 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81074772403 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614814814815 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.625215855 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24025075354 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112385935833 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704603584303 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142060098775 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102932016308 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.