The table below shows the percentages of individuals under the age of 18 and over 60 in California, Utah, and Florida, as well as their average annual income and impoverished population.
Given is the table delineating an abstract classification on the age, average income and the population who live under poverty in three different states in the USA, namely California, Utah and Florida.
It is perceptible that the rate of people under 18 in Utah is the highest while Florida has the most senior citizens of the three states. Despite, in California, the average income per person is in proportion to the percentage of poor people that is the most gargantuan.
When it comes to the population categorised in age, people aged under 18 make up 28% of Utah’s population while the figures for California and Florida are only 17% and 16%, respectively. In contrast, the proportion of the elderly in Florida is by far the greatest with 23%, which is almost 4 times higher than that in Utah at 8% and simultaneously 10% bigger than that in California.
In the interim, the more money an individual earns on average, the higher the proportion of indigent populations in these three states. Regarding average income per capita, California is the leading state with $23,000, followed by Florida at $22,000. Even though the fact that Utah stands far behind with just $17,000 in this case, only 9% of its population lives under the poverty line when compared to 16% and 12% of those in California and Florida in turn.
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- What are the advantages of learning English in an English speaking country 68
- The diagram below shows how honey is made in small scale commercial production Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 37
- The charts give information about world forest in five different regions Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83628318584 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74975347573 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526548672566 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.7716280731 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.625 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339291544251 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150312391164 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699736193595 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219281745624 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364787484097 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.