The table illustrates the estimated expenditures for three environmental projects in American dollars in three large parts of the world. The projected estimation included the time horizon for 5 years where costings are shown according to each year.
It is clear predicted that the most costly years will be the first year in all three regions. However, the highest costs are expected in South-East Asia where costs are predicted to be 30 million American dollars, while 10 million dollars less are expected to spend in Central America and about 20 million dollars are lover in West Africa. According to the third there forecast, expenditures in West Africa and Central America will decrease sharply to 7,5 million and 12 million respectively in the second year. The following two years the expenses in both regions will reduce almost twice in comparison with the previous year and will remain steady. By contrast, forecaster changes in South-east Asia will decrease almost one third the second year (in comparison with the first year), but will grow twice the third year (in comparison with the second year) and will increase slightly the fourth year remaining stable the next year at 50 million dollars.
From the pie chart it can be seen is that in the first year a half of costs will cover salaries, one-third or the finance will be devoted to the set-up costs and the rest of money is planned to divide equally between training and office expenses.
To conclude, the most expensive environmental financing is expected to be in South-east Asia primarily because of overall growth of expenses there within following four years.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 90
- You have been given a gift of money. Which would you rather spend it on:a) a piece of jewelryb) a pair of concert ticketsc) an expensive meal 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 90
- the table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03333333333 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57693951888 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.7216351998 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.0 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282916109422 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14092166121 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100437840599 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178708399877 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147931628479 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.