The table represents British adults’ and children’s income distribution to a range of popular components, including food, electronic equipment, music, and videos in 1998.
Overall, most of the aforementioned categories occupied a larger proportion of children’ earnings than of adults’ ones, making an exception of food. Furthermore, there was a difference in male and female ways of allocating their budgets on separate items.
Accounting for 39%, music was the largest components of children spendings, in which the proportion between boys and girls were nearly the same (at 38% and 40% respectively). Meanwhile, this figure for adults was eight-fold lower, with no difference between men and women. In contrast to children, mature people spent more on food than other items. 25% of adults' budget went on food, much higher than that of children (at 10%). Interestingly, in the case of adults, that the female spendings on food tripled male ones, was recorded whereas there was a marginal disparity of 2% in children's case.
Regarding electronic equipment, this component constituted the second largest proportion of children income, but witnessed the most enormous divergence between boys and girls, with boys allocating 18% of earnings to this item, in comparison with girls at only 5%. Despite a comparatively lower percentage in case of adults, a similar variance was seen, with 10% for male citizens and 1% for female ones. Relating to videos, children spent 12% of the budget on these categories, compared to adults with merely 1%. However, while boys and girls represented an equal proportion of videos expenditure, men surpassed women by exactly 4 times.
- The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001. 84
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006. 78
- The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998. 78
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 78
- The charts below compare five different countries showing the electricity used measured in megawatts or mw in a typical hospital during one week and also the number of emergency medical calls made by local residents during the same week The last chart sho 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t 12% of the budget on these categories, compared to adults with merely 1%. Howev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42366412214 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07595938446 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580152671756 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 283.868780488 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0993041918 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.416666667 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 5.23603664747 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0871798455118 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327483649695 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341386877953 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619095847764 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358149814597 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 40.7170731707 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.