The table compares 6 continents in terms of the forest area in three years 1990, 2000 and 2005.
Overall, there was a forested land expansion in European and Asian countries while African, North American, Oceanian and South American ones underwent a reduction.
Europe had the largest area of forest, increasing exponentially from 989 million ha in 1990 to over 1 billion ha in 2005. Starting at 576 million ha in 1990, the forest land in Asian dropped considerably in 2000 but soared to 584 million ha in 2005.
A similar pattern was not reflected in other regions. Despite having the second largest area during 15 years, South American suffered the most severe loss in forest land, plummeting by 64 million ha. A nearly similar decrease was observed in Africa, from 749m ha in 1990 to 691m ha in 2005. By comparison, America ranked fourth in 1990 but outstripped Africa afterward since its forest area went down insignificantly and leveled off at 705 million hectares after 2000. Only 2 million hectares was lost in Oceania, whose forest land was also the smallest.
- In many countries, truancy is a worrying problem for both parents and educators. What are the causes of truancy and what may be the effects on the child and the wider community? 84
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 78
- The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001. 84
- Some commentators feel that grandparents should live together with their children and grandchildren, while others say that elderly people should be encouraged to live independently.Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach yo 89
- The graph below shows the quantities of good transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91712707182 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64738329676 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613259668508 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9297596442 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124948299023 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584062406289 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377608089095 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760470517368 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245308513121 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.