The chart compares the carriage of goods by four different modes of transport in the UK between 1974 and 2002.
Overall, the number of goods transported by road, water and pipeline increased over the period shown, while that carried by rail tended to decrease.
Of 4 modes, road was the most popular. Despite a slight fluctuation, its volume of goods increased significantly, from 70bn tonnes in 1974 to roughly 100bn tonnes in 2002.
Having a relatively similar level which remained stable at around 40 tonnes during the first 4 years, water and rail followed different patterns in the rest of the period. Except a moderate decline from 1992 to 1998, the transport of goods by water almost expanded to just under 65bn tonnes. Conversely, rail experienced a dramatic decrease, hitting the bottom at approximately 25bn tonnes in 1994, before recovering to slightly over its starting point in 2002.
Seeing the third largest increase in the amount of goods carried, pipeline was still the least common. It carried only 5bn tonnes in 1974, which, then, rose gradually by 1995, prior to leveling off at 20bn tonnes afterward.
- The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 73
- The charts below compare five different countries showing the electricity used measured in megawatts or mw in a typical hospital during one week and also the number of emergency medical calls made by local residents during the same week The last chart sho 94
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries. 78
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 78
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, still, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0103626943 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5789787851 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60621761658 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.057728721 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.444444444 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17843966801 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853476247708 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118321262628 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135142235417 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138108974811 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.