The table illustrates the outcome of a 20-year research, which was conducted to find out reasons for attending different arts in the UK. The information is presented in terms of average adult attendance as a percentage of population.
Overall, the leading cause of attending entertainment events has been the preference to see a favorite artist over the study period. Arts for celebration purpose has dropped dramatically, whereas, business and kids have significantly increased as reasons for participating art events.
In view of seeing a celebrity, over half of UK adults have taken part in entertainment activities for last 20 years, and still remains as the primary reason at 56%. The percentage of adults who accompany kids for these events stood at 9% at the beginning of the study and has risen to just below 3 times (24%) today. Similarly, work reason has nearly doubled from 6% to 11% over the period.
In contrast, art events have reduced its popularity as a reason for celebrations in 3 folds, from 27% to 9% for last 20 years.
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sale Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The bar chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people claim that not enough of waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requierement To what extent do you think laws are needen to make people recycle more of their waste 67
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth
- Some people think that music plays an important role in society Others think it is simply a form of entertainment Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, still, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99428571429 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98732014231 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2795752267 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255094979253 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108211095396 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644521130332 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159068519888 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628717365805 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.