The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
The table depicts the outcomes of a survey of a university in three different years. The spectacular feature of the chart is a satisfaction of students in 2010 by Electronic gadgets.
At a fleeting glance, it is clearly observed that teaching quality was praised by approximately two-third of individuals in 2000 however at the end of the decade it surged by the 4%. Majority of pupils were delighted with the services of Print resources in all the years. Moreover, 32% students gave positive remarks to the range of modules offered in 2000 whereas this number collapsed by 2% and 3% in the following years.
Moving further, there was a consistency in the ratings of the building and teaching facilities that was 77% in every year. It is interesting to note that only 45% people were glad by the services of electronic resources while this number elevated by 28% after 5 years and again uplifted by 16% in the subsequent years.
All-in-all, a paramount number of people were happier with all the aspects of a university except the range of modules offered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | dilipkarki | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | junjunh | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | junjunh | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | junjunh | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Huong Linh | 73 | view |
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day. 78
- Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes? 35
- The table below gives information about Favorite Pastimes in different countries. 11
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000. 78
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88950276243 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84045609659 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552486187845 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3819438322 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.625 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0634133535455 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314989403551 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398048398039 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0434505229019 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527456609113 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.