The table below shows the salaries of secondary/high school teachers in 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table given illustrates the incomes of secondary and high school teachers in 2009 in five countries, namely Australia, Denmark, Luxembourg, Japan and Korea.
Overall, teachers in Luxembourg earned the most compared to those in other four countries, while Australia’s teachers were given the lowest salaries.
The payments for teachers in Luxembourg ranked first with 80,000 for those who had just started, nearly doubling that of Denmark with 45,000. Although Japan’s teachers were only paid 34,000 at the beginning, their incomes when they had been working for 15 years and also the maximum ones came in the second position with 65,000 and 86,000, respectively. Besides, Luxembourg still headed in those two kinds of salary with 119,000 and 132,000.
Australia’s teachers earned the least in their starting payments with 28,000, compared to those of Korea, which were 30,000. However, teachers in Australia and Korea shared the same incomes after they worked for 15 years with 48,000. Turning to numbers of years to reach maximum salary, Japan headed with 37 years, less than five times as much as that of Denmark with 8 years, which was the lowest figure.
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 73
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advanced technology which can prevent and solve crime Do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4832188653 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5203282433 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0802343788696 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487115533413 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599388776538 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790900066886 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721942151948 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.