The presented table data illustrates the number of international guests and the cash that those visitors spent on travelling in France, USA, Spain, China and Italy in 2012 and 2013.
As is observed, France had the most attraction by the travelers from around the world while the US got the highest revenue from this service industry in both two years.
According to this table, the number of tourists had an increase dramatically in American and Spain by 3.1 millions and 3.2 millions respectively from 2012 to 2013. Even though France and Italy rose slightly from 83 millions and 46.4 millions to 84.7 millions and 47.7 millions in the order given, France still was the most attractive destination in 2013. Despite China loss 2 millions visitors, Italy still had the lowest travelers came to during this period.
In contrast, the money that Italy found which increased more than France by 2.7 billion and 2.5 billion in that order. Although China hadn’t the high jump from 2012 to 2013, it still made the money more than Italy with 51.7 billion and 43.9 billion respectivly . Specially, the amount of cash that the US made which was high as twice as those for the others.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: danthoai711
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pectively from 2012 to 2013. Even though France and Italy rose slightly from 83 m...
^^
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...1.7 billion and 43.9 billion respectivly . Specially, the amount of cash that the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88059701493 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44566981681 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8673884438 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0599792240371 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.029492480559 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331982209677 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0423112164131 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394969090742 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.