The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table compares the amount of water used for 3 different purposes in 6 nations in 2001. Overall, agriculture gained the greatest proportion of water usage.

As can be clearly seen that Australia and Canada achieved the highest water usage in domestics (341 and 279 m3) . Next came Russia and Turkey, accounting for 98 and 80 m3 respectively. The smallest proportion of water used in Canada and UK, according to 26 and 38 m3 in 2001.

Regarding to agriculture, there was a huge amount of water used in Russia and Turkey (1663 and 1462m3). Canadian also used 1338m3 for agricultural activities. However, 3 other countries used less water, for about 605 to 810m3. Finally, 532m3 of water was used for industry by Canadian, gained the greatest number whereas China as well as Turkey the smallest. On the other hand, Canada and United Kingdom’s industrial water usage was 275 and 398m3 while only 96m3 of water was used by Russian.

In the nutshell, Canadian used the highest amount of water in total.
(172 words).

Votes
Average: 4.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-27 Sai sushma 67 view
2016-11-22 jimpan 67 view
2021-03-22 Judie6203 73 view
2021-03-22 Judie6203 73 view
2021-03-22 Judie6203 73 view
Essays by user birdcage11761 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ater usage in domestics (341 and 279 m3) . Next came Russia and Turkey, accounting...
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'finally', 'however', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'well', 'whereas', 'while', 'as well as', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243781094527 0.268076937826 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.109452736318 0.116061578633 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0945273631841 0.0759168565197 125% => OK
Adverbs: 0.044776119403 0.0366838410393 122% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.134328358209 0.155750635184 86% => OK
Participles: 0.0497512437811 0.0379272487307 131% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.62625442663 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0149253731343 0.0210936926555 71% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0547263681592 0.0948980150116 58% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00497512437811 0.00437022459523 114% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1022.0 1161.00487805 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.9 88% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87356321839 5.90752243213 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73763899035 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.33908045977 0.337110787985 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.229885057471 0.247514529752 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.189655172414 0.171178102325 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.109195402299 0.112407865282 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62625442663 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.546246751206 105% => OK
Word variations: 50.5887101949 49.3433353143 103% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 8.93414634146 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.5 23.0094962315 63% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.157033777 42.9750493124 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1666666667 135.714022679 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5 23.0094962315 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 0.689975730869 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 37.4885057471 47.7609492067 78% => OK
Elegance: 2.77419354839 2.94281807926 94% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421309541939 0.418131533498 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.129058841304 0.181151798455 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0807391760578 0.0850326197045 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.632939008992 0.706616315825 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.179854095285 0.157042692854 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184277720129 0.228904883108 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126238838142 0.108899403657 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.32128064599 0.367819155151 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0459170948047 0.0812612215331 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32697640922 0.316326947829 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689175008792 0.0921553760075 75% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70731707317 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.08536585366 147% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 7.1512195122 140% => OK

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.