The chart represents information about the international market share of the notebook computer market for manufactures in the from 2006 to 2007.
Overall, it can be clealy seen that in the initial year, most of the percentage had marketed share by the hp company. In the second year, highest of the ratio had marketed share by the hp company.
To begin with, it can be seen that in the year of 2006,the highest percentage had marketing share by the hp at around 31.4 % as well as in the year of 2007 at around 34%.In 2006,the lowest percent had marketed share by the fujitsu-Siemens at about 4.8%.In 2007,the least amount had marketed share by the toshiba at around 7.3%.The same percentage had marketed share by the toshiba in 2006 and in 2007 of lenovo at about 6.2%. The toshiba had increased the marketed share in the next year at 7.3% except other six category of company had decreased of overall the time period.
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 67
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 67
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
...computer market for manufactures in the from 2006 to 2007. Overall, it can be cle...
^^^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed share by the hp company. To begin with, it can be seen that in the year of...
^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ll as in the year of 2007 at around 34%.In 2006,the lowest percent had marketed sh...
^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...re by the fujitsu-Siemens at about 4.8%.In 2007,the least amount had marketed shar...
^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ted share by the toshiba at around 7.3%.The same percentage had marketed share by t...
^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ased the marketed share in the next year at 7.3% except other six category of com...
^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...the next year at 7.3% except other six category of company had decreased of overall the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 762.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7037037037 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58852088321 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462962962963 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 124.182768531 43.030603864 289% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 152.4 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279743374432 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193927700098 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111324638893 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251211735614 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111287440264 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.