The table illustrates how many people traveled abroad in four distinct years: 1990, 1995, 2000, and 2005, across four different regions.
What stands out from the table is that while the number of tourists to Africa, Europe, Asia and the Pacific, and the Middle East, as well as the total for global travel, witnessed an increase, the opposite trend was observed for travel to the Americas. Additionally, the number of people traveling to the Middle East was consistently the lowest.
Starting at the highest point in 1990, with 680.5 million people traveling to the Americas, this figure experienced some fluctuations before declining dramatically by about one-sixth to 113.2 million in 2005. In contrast, the number of people choosing Europe as a tourist destination surged sharply from 280.2 million to the highest position among the four regions over the years.
Finally, the other three regions exhibited a relatively increasing trend in the number of people traveling internationally over time. The figures for Asia and the Pacific rose from 18.2 million to 28.7 million, and from 60.2 million to 113.2 million, respectively. The figures for the Middle East were always the lowest but still experienced an increase of 6 million over the four years from 1990 to 2005. A similar trend was observed in the total number of people traveling abroad from the four regions, which rose from 448.9 million to 693.7 million during the decade.
- Video records are better to learn about the way other people in the world lives than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree It seems to be an increasingly widespread controversy about the method of learning in people nowadays video reco 78
- The table shows the percentages of adults in urban and rural a areas who took part in 4 fee time activities in 1990 and 2010 73
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro Given is the line chart illustrating the average monthly spending on four cell phones in 73
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, still, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59593136819 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529914529915 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8605521121 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221579597782 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106148486608 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381181590064 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14873400949 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315065068948 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.