The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne units 2005 Pres

Essay topics:

The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)
2005 Present 2025
Hamburgers 40 38 51
Fried Chicken 35 37 45
Salads 5 15 41
Fried Rice 6 9 9
Noodles 6 8 9
You should write at least 150 words.

The above table illustrates, total amount of junk food consumed on daily basis by an people. It’s divided into 5 types: Hamburgers, Fried Chicken, Salads and Fried rice, Noodles in country of Melbourne, and between the year of 2005 and 2025.
Generally, Year of 2005 as well as 2005 Consumption of hamburgers and Fried Chicken is nearly same. Meanwhile, both Fried rice, noodles have equal number of participants. Finally, Intake of salads on a daily basis is fluctuating.
From above picture, Consumption of Hamburgers is on top of list both years 2005 and 2025 40 – 50. However, Foods like Fried Rice, Noodles Ranks Lowest having units 6 – 9. Meanwhile, Healthy foods like Salad are at constant level. Fried Chicken and hamburgers have units nearer to them 35 – 45.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-04 AhaanIshaan 11 view
2022-02-24 Awadhesh Mourya 73 view
2021-11-11 sahil singh view
2021-08-27 AhaanIshaan 11 view
2021-08-06 thaovy03032005 76 view
Essays by user vigvinraj4 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...of junk food consumed on daily basis by an people. It's divided into 5 types:...
^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'Ranks the Lowest'.
Suggestion: Ranks the Lowest
...However, Foods like Fried Rice, Noodles Ranks Lowest having units 6 – 9. Meanwhile, Healthy ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 654.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 131.0 196.424390244 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99236641221 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.38312328216 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64774378876 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63358778626 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 182.7 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4175219813 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.6666666667 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5555555556 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0829570311683 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402289286715 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499288986675 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626685142611 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456377225135 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.