The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table discloses the information about the amounts of five most popular fast foods consumed in Melbourne among three years.
Hamburgers and Fried chicken are the most popular among all years as compared to salads, fried rice, and noodles. Hamburgers remain the everlasting favorite as 40 units in 2005, slightly lower in present time but it is forecasted that there will be a gradual rise in its popularity and reached at 51 units. Fried chicken is increasing its consumption slowly and steady like 35, 37 and 45 respectively.
Fried rice and noodles had the same almost same demand in all given years as they were 6 units in 2005, fried rice stays at 9 during the other two given time periods. Salads were least ate by people in 2005(5 units) but after that time it climbed by 10 units.it is predicted that salad will have the highest increase in 2025 as 41 units.
Overall, all western foods will get in demand but salads will also at third place out of them.
- Should university deduct the student's score for the late submission assignments.discuss? 84
- Should university deduct the student's score for the late submission assignments.discuss? 85
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 77
- Tarnagul is a small town near Melbourne. The maps show the town'sdevelopment over a period of time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the least'.
Suggestion: were the least
...he other two given time periods. Salads were least ate by people in 20055 units but after ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66081871345 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36015451445 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2862767111 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.857142857 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0584043976298 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353682995719 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754738968335 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0618945242508 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912508239633 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.