The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010, 2012 and 2014
The given table demonstrates figures of five different types of transportation registered in Australia during the period of 4 years commencing from 2010.
Overall, there was an increase in all five vehicles named, with Motorcycles experiencing the most dramatic change. In addition, Passenger vehicles consistently had the highest figures throughout the period, while the opposite was true for Light trucks.
Regarding the most popular transportation, 11,800,000 Passenger vehicles registered in 2010, with a significant increase up to 13,000,000 in 2014. The number of motorcycles was 540,000 in 2010, after which it experienced a continual growth to 709,000 at the end of the period. In spite of having the highest figures, Passenger vehicles just witnessed 10,2% change, which was far less than Motorcycles (30,8%).
Although Light trucks had the lowest figures, they experienced the second percentage of change (23,5%) from 106,000 to 131,000. In the meantime, the figures for Commercial vehicles and Heavy trucks were 2,300,000 and 384,000 in 2010, followed by a considerable rise to 2,700,000 and 416,000 in 2014, with 17,4% and 8,3% change in that turn.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-19 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-20 | ngtlinh | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world what are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media Do you agree that this is the main cause of juvenile crime What solutions can you offer to deal with this situation 78
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 78
- he charts below give information about different types of waste diposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, while, in addition, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57303370787 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99854781164 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612359550562 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.362607426 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176172496458 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858210250002 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825620532557 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130866667726 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880695900631 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, while, in addition, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57303370787 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99854781164 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612359550562 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.362607426 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176172496458 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858210250002 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825620532557 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130866667726 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880695900631 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.