The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010, 2012 and 2014.
The table illustrates the number of vehicles divided into five categories which were registered in Australia during the period from 2012 to 2014.
Overall, there were general upward trends in the registration of all the five types of vehicles, and passenger vehicles were considered the most popular type in Australia. It is also clear that the figure for motorcycles experienced a dramatic change during the given period.
11,800,000 passenger vehicles were registered in 2010, which was approximately five times as high as that of commercial ones (2,300,000). Afterwards, the car registration of these two types increase noticeably to 13,000,000 for the former and 2,700,000 for the latter in the following four years.
In comparison, there were 540,000 motorcycles registered in 2010, followed by a tremendous rise of 30.8%, four years later. A similar pattern can be seen for light trucks which also grew remarkably by 23.5%, from 106,000 to 131,000. At the same time, the percentage of change of heavy trucks was smallest, at only 8.3% compared to the other types of vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-19 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-20 | ngtlinh | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 78
- The table below gives information about the values of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 78
- Every year an increasing number of people suffer from fast food related diseases The government therefore should impose a high tax on fast food To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 67
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT THE BEST WAY TO REDUCE CRIME IS TO GIVE LONGER PRISON SENTENCES OTHERS HOWEVER BELIEVE THERE ARE BETTER ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF REDUCING CRIME DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27167630058 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86720352014 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.0450533 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227409362752 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101936286507 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107161064163 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161863415042 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101233980686 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.