The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and repairing the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts illustrate the percentages of males and females getting married, divided into six different age groups in one country in the year 1996 and 2008.
Overall, the majority of females got married at a younger age than males. It is also clear that while the average age of marriage for females was 25 to 29, there was an upward trend in males’ figures in the 30-34 and 35-39 age group.
Only 1% of women from 16 to19 was married in 1996, followed by a drop to a relatively small percentage in 2008, whereas no men got married at this age. Women between 20 and 24 accounted for 6% which was higher than that of men who were 30 to 35, at 4%, after which both figures decreased almost twofold to 3% and just over 2% respectively. The percentages of females aged 25 to 29 (just under 12%) and 40 to 44 (2%) remained unchanged over the 12-year period. At the same time, there was a slight rise from 7% to 8% in females from 30-34.
As for males, there was no significant change regarding the 20 to 24 age group, stabilizing at about 2%. Males’ figures aged 25 to 29 and 40 and over witnessed a slight drop to 8% for the former and nearly 3.5% for the latter in 2006. Finally, starting at 9%, the proportion of men aged 30 to 34 showed an increase of 3% in 2008. A similar trend can be seen for the 35-39 group, rising from 4% to over 11%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-06 | denistran85 | 73 | view |
| 2018-02-23 | taho.ielts | 59 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO 2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The graph below shows the sales of Adult s fiction Children s books and Education s books between 2002 and 2006 in one country 89
- Every year an increasing number of people suffer from fast food related diseases The government therefore should impose a high tax on fast food To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 90
- You and some friends ate a meal at a restaurant to celebrate a special occasion and you were very pleased with the food and service 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.2480620155 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35124087107 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6969209782 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6363636364 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108671157272 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515965132481 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530538568857 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877351349087 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407025392752 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.67 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.