The table illustrates the changes in the amount of money spent on an average Australian household, each month, between 1991 and 2001.
In general, the total expenditure per month spent in 2001 was higher than that of the household consumed in 1991. Additionally, the figures for all categories indicated an increase over a 10-year period, with the exception of clothing and transport.
In 1991, food and other commodities and services accounted for the largest amount of money used monthly with $155 and $250, respectively. After that, they increased modestly to $160 and $270 in 2001, followed by accommodation and utility bills growing from $95 and $75 to $100 and $120 each month during 10 years.
The table illustrates the changes in the amount of money spent on an average Australian household, each month, between 1991 and 2001.
In general, the total expenditure per month spent in 2001 was higher than that of the household consumed in 1991. Additionally, the figures for all categories indicated an increase over a 10-year period, with the exception of clothing and transport.
In 1991, food and other commodities and services accounted for the largest amount of money used monthly with $155 and $250, respectively. After that, they increased modestly to $160 and $270 in 2001, followed by accommodation and utility bills growing from $95 and $75 to $100 and $120 each month during 10 years.
The expenses invested in clothing and transportation, on the other hand, experienced a similar downward trend. From 1991 to 2001, the average cost of transportation fell gradually from $70 to $45 while less $50 was charged for clothing ($30-$20) per specific month for a decade.
The expenses invested in clothing and transportation, on the other hand, experienced a similar downward trend. From 1991 to 2001, the average cost of transportation fell gradually from $70 to $45 while less $50 was charged for clothing ($30-$20) per specific month for a decade.
The table illustrates the changes in the amount of money spent on an average Australian household, each month, between 1991 and 2001
The table illustrates the changes in the amount of money spent on an average Australian household, each month, between 1991 and 2001.
In general, the total expenditure per month spent in 2001 was higher than that of the household consumed in 1991. Additionally, the figures for all categories indicated an increase over a 10-year period, with the exception of clothing and transport.
In 1991, food and other commodities and services accounted for the largest amount of money used monthly with $155 and $250, respectively. After that, they increased modestly to $160 and $270 in 2001, followed by accommodation and utility bills growing from $95 and $75 to $100 and $120 each month during 10 years.
The expenses invested in clothing and transportation, on the other hand, experienced a similar downward trend. From 1991 to 2001, the average cost of transportation fell gradually from $70 to $45 while less $50 was charged for clothing ($30-$20) per specific month for a decade.
In general, the total expenditure per month spent in 2001 was higher than that of the household consumed in 1991. Additionally, the figures for all categories indicated an increase over a 10-year period, with the exception of clothing and transport.
In 1991, food and other commodities and services accounted for the largest amount of money used monthly with $155 and $250, respectively. After that, they increased modestly to $160 and $270 in 2001, followed by accommodation and utility bills growing from $95 and $75 to $100 and $120 each month during 10 years.
The expenses invested in clothing and transportation, on the other hand, experienced a similar downward trend. From 1991 to 2001, the average cost of transportation fell gradually from $70 to $45 while less $50 was charged for clothing ($30-$20) per specific month for a decade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-07 | zhangfei123 | 11 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | zhangfei123 | view | |
| 2021-11-07 | zhangfei123 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | zhangfei123 | 67 | view |
- The provided charts illustrate the changes in the proportions of the household expenses in a particular nation between 1950 and 2010
- It is assumed that there is an increasing trend for famous individuals who may have negative influences on young people due to their glamour and richness without talents From my perspective I definitely agree with this point of view and my reasons are as 73
- The provided charts make comparisons among various types of energy generation in France between 1995 and 2005 In general the percentage of fossil fuels production always dominated in both years with coal being the largest while nuclear and other kinds of
- It is assumed that there is an increasing trend for famous individuals who may have negative influences on young people due to their glamour and richness without talents From my perspective I definitely agree with this point of view and my reasons are as 73
- The table illustrates the changes in the amount of money spent on an average Australian household each month between 1991 and 2001 In general the total expenditure per month spent in 2001 was higher than that of the household consumed in 1991 Additionally
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., each month, between 1991 and 2001. In general, the total expenditure per mo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ated an increase over a 10-year period, with the exception of clothing and transport. In 1991...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...exception of clothing and transport. In 1991, food and other commodities and ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 and 20 each month during 10 years. The expenses invested in clothing and t...
^^^^^
Line 16, column 204, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ated an increase over a 10-year period, with the exception of clothing and transport. In 1991, foo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 6.8 294% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 965.302439024 168% => OK
No of words: 320.0 196.424390244 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.053125 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96929435799 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.315625 0.547539520022 58% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 283.868780488 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 3.36585365854 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3920139743 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.384615385 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 3.83414634146 209% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.532184492201 0.215688989381 247% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.233132923284 0.103423049105 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.273845160044 0.0843802449381 325% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367152551209 0.15604864568 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.243382153843 0.0819641961636 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., each month, between 1991 and 2001. In general, the total expenditure per mo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ated an increase over a 10-year period, with the exception of clothing and transport. In 1991...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...exception of clothing and transport. In 1991, food and other commodities and ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 and 20 each month during 10 years. The expenses invested in clothing and t...
^^^^^
Line 16, column 204, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ated an increase over a 10-year period, with the exception of clothing and transport. In 1991, foo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 6.8 294% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 965.302439024 168% => OK
No of words: 320.0 196.424390244 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.053125 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96929435799 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.315625 0.547539520022 58% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 283.868780488 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 3.36585365854 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3920139743 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.384615385 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 3.83414634146 209% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.532184492201 0.215688989381 247% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.233132923284 0.103423049105 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.273845160044 0.0843802449381 325% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367152551209 0.15604864568 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.243382153843 0.0819641961636 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.