The table illustrates the figure of boys in two age groups participating in 5 distinct sports in the UK in year 2000.
The table illustrates the figure of boys in two age groups participating in 5 distinct sports in the UK in year 2000.
It is clear that boys who were between 6 and 11 years old are generally more likely to play sports than the other group. Additionally, football was the most common kind of sport for both age groups.
87% of boys who aged 6-11 chose football to play, compared to 78% of boys in the 12-16 age group. The percentages of in two groups taking part in basketball were 35% and 25% respectively.
Turning to the remaining sports, cricket was more popular than rugby and swimming. In terms of playing cricket, 6-11 year-old-boys accounted for 45%, while the figure for 12-16 year-old-boys was 34%. In addition, the proportions of boys taking part in rugby in the 6-11 age group and boys who aged 12-16 years old were 23% and 21% respectively. Finally, boys who enjoy swimming were the same in both age groups, with 19%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-28 | IVANTRUONG | 61 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | IVANTRUONG | 81 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 69
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012. 11
- Scientists agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people Others think education will not work 95
- have a right to own a gun. 73
- Some people believe the government should spend money building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others however think that building more and wider roads is a better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views and give your opinio 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, while, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63253012048 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63927618444 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542168674699 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.1208800307 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.4444444444 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452896210193 0.215688989381 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222130692841 0.103423049105 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.281643586058 0.0843802449381 334% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.402372542268 0.15604864568 258% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.345193833135 0.0819641961636 421% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.