The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
The table presents the data on the quantity of land (in millions of hectares) covered with woods in six world areas. The information available shows the changes in the number of within the periods between 1990, 2000 and 2005. Overall, it can be clearly seen that the situation differs in different parts of the globe.
Of the three biggest areas represented, two- Africa (749 mln ha) and South America (946 mln ha) - demonstrate a considerable decrease in the forested area, namely by 58 and 64 mln hectares. Europe, being the most vastly covered with woods area (989 mln ha), demonstrates slight growth by 9 mln in 2000, and then by 3 within the next five-year period. Oceania and North America experienced a slight decline in the forested area by 2 and 3 mln ha, respectively.
The only area to experience at first decline from 576 to 570 mln ha, and then recovery by 14 mln ha, is Asia.
Overall, globally the forested area is gradually shrinking, which is an alarming trend
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Shivam7090 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | Spring2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | hung253 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | lyvvu | 61 | view |
- Internet users 78
- We often hear that new technology presents a threat to our traditions In what ways however can new technologies help maintain our traditions 77
- Carbon cycle 78
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world. 84
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reas represented, two- Africa 749 mln ha and South America 946 mln ha - demonstra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71929824561 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65719300937 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625730994152 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0975076914 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177143405667 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840476622778 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978809728821 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113774011002 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147390512302 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.