This table shows how many people (in millions) used different form public transport in Milan between 2010 and 2014
The table compares the numbers of people using different means of transport in Milan from 2010 to 2014.
It is evident from the given table that there was a upward trend in the transport passengers during the period of 4 years. Furthermore, while metro was by far the most enjoyable mode of transport, the number of people using taxis was considerably low.
In 2010, 3 millions people chose to travel by metro, which was the largest number in comparison with others, followed by a steady increase to 5 millions at the final stage. Taxis, on the other hand, gained the least popularity, from only 0.6 millions users to 1 millions after 4 years period.
In terms of trains and trams, although there was a similar numbers of passengers at the initial year at around 1.3 millions, after 4 years, train passengers amounted to 3.6 millions, whereas that of trams was just 2.2 millions. People chosing to travel by buses also witnessed a rise throungout 4 years period, from exactly 1 millions in 2010 to 2.1 millions in 2013, which overtook that of trams, and then had reached 2.4 millions by the final year surveyed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-23 | kingnight153 | 73 | view |
| 2017-03-22 | kingnight153 | 72 | view |
- There are many zoos in the world. What are the benefits and drawbacks of keeping animals in zoos. 89
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes which have occurred do you think these changes are positive or negative 84
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- The chart below gives information about the percentage of the adult population who were overweight in four different countries in 1980 1990 and 2000 72
- The consumption of the world’s resources (oil, and water etc.) is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are causes and solutions? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ent from the given table that there was a upward trend in the transport passenger...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77835051546 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52554701281 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.3177949422 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223124054214 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128966218491 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121584484869 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184497696311 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132374844511 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.