The diagram illustrates the preferences of people using different forms of public transport in the city of Milan.
Overall, the number of taxis which were used for plying were quite less in 2006 compared to the utilisation of metro vehicles in 2014. The data is made available for five years.
It is clear that the usage of different modes of land borne transport is on the rise. Count of passengers plying through trains increases from 1.4 millions to 3.6 millions. Number of buses have risen from 1 million to 2.4 millions, from 2010 to 2014. This increase is slower for trams which have grown at around 0.9 million people using it. Users of taxis have also risen from 0.6 million to 1.0 million, while metro users have catapulted from 3 million users to 5 million. This again shows that the preference for metros is much higher compared to taxis. Perhaps, it is the expenses in plying which make usage of taxis prohibitive.
On the whole, it is clear that quicker and cheaper means of travelling is most preferred as compared to slower means. Most
probably, the primary reason why trams and taxis are facing the least preference. Obviously, the frequency of trains, metros and buses have been double that of the initial usage.
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth. 56
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm and stages in the production of the Silk Cloth. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017, which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project. 67
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... been double that of the initial usage.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88262910798 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3959950273 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558685446009 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2411455194 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.0 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3846153846 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53846153846 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21781953829 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722302599537 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868275316955 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112215287781 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124707041631 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.