The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2013-2012.

The diagram depicts the trends in different facets of crime in Newport city for a period of nine years.

On the whole, it is clear that the crime rates are falling, barring the case of car thefts. In case of these thefts there has been a steep rise from 2011 as compared to 2012.

To begin with, the cases of robberies were reported at over 500 incidents in 2003, while stealing of cars and burglaries hovered around 3000 and 3500 respectively. Furthermore ,2005 and 2010 witnessed some dramatic changes in instances of robbers, burglars and car thieves. In 2005, there was a peak in burglary to about 4000 incidents, with about 1000 cases of personal thefts and 3000 missing cars. Similarly, 2010 witnessed about 2500 car losses, with a sharp plunge in burglary at around 1500 cases.

Ever since this instance, the reported cases of burglary and robbery have been about the same levels. In a welcome change the number of burglaries have fallen over the years. The real cause for concern springs from the cars lost, the crimes continue to stay around the same numbers for the past 9 years. Though, there were always fewer cases of robberies , they also continue to happen without any reduction.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 3000 and 3500 respectively. Furthermore ,2005 and 2010 witnessed some dramatic ch...
^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ere were always fewer cases of robberies , they also continue to happen without an...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, similarly, so, while, on the whole, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8309178744 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3214334482 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6115254109 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.9090909091 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0931962399412 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407541196328 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503114156184 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805810697187 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588383934695 0.0819641961636 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.