The given table illustrates the ratio of people who own mobile phones and personal computers per thousand of the population in 2003 in 6 different nations.
Overall, it can be seen that the majority of citizens in Luxemburg were mobile holders and PC owners, whereas the number of Chinese people having two devices mentioned above was modest. Furthermore, PC was more preferred electrical appliance in Luxemburg, Singapore, South Korea, and China rather than mobile phones.
According to the survey, in every 1000 people living in Luxemburg, there were 9/10 of the total were PC and mobile owners which was also the highest recorded fraction among 6 countries. Standing the second and third place were Singaporean and South Korean dwellers with 690 and 452 computers per 1000 people, respectively. A modest figure was seen in China, with 1/10 of the population were people having personal computers and the number of mobile holders was much lower, with only 35 units per 1000 people.
In contrast, people in Italy and Germany had a tendency to use mobile phones instead of PC. In Italy, 737 was the number of mobile holders, which nearly doubled the figure for people owing PC. The gap was much smaller in the two consumer groups purchasing mobile phones and PC in Germany, with 586 and 452 per 1000 people, respectively.
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 78
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city 61
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- Fossil fuels are the main sources in many countries but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is it positive or negative development 73
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...n in China, with 1/10 of the population were people having personal computers and th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, second, so, third, well, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00452488688 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53373463965 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542986425339 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5794616829 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.888888889 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230110504602 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112170334783 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735788010879 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168682894433 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833733325811 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.