The table shows the percentage of workers in agriculture, manufacturing and services in 7
European countries in 2014.
The table compares the rates of workers in three sectors in 7 different countries during 2014.
It is clear that the majority of laborers worked in service sector. Additionally, agriculture had the smallest percentages of employees in average.
In 2014, the percentage of people in the Uk worked in service industry was 83.5%, while the figures for Greece and France were relatively lower, at 80.6% and 78.9% respectively. By contrast, only 1.3% of England workforces worked in agriculture industry. Likewise, except for Czech Republic and Romania, the proportions of agriculture's employees in other countries were all lower than 5%.
On the other hand, the rates for people employed in manufacturing were varied, but all figures were higher than 15%. Czech Republic had the highest proportion of people worked in manufacturing sector, at 37.4%, compared to 29% of Ukraina workforces. Meanwhile, Greece's and England's rates were significantly lower, at 15.9% and 15.2% respectively.
- The table shows the percentage of workers in agriculture manufacturing and services in 7 European countries in 2014 71
- The diagram below contain information regarding the percentage of people occupied in various type of position in 1999 and 2001 50
- The figure gives information about smoking habit of the UK population by age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 84
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, while, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51973684211 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03430724044 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1855985424 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2222222222 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163049913632 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070121183781 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727870774458 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123114154736 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780292211046 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.