The table shows the proportion of female and male aged 15 and aged 75 from 1961 to 2011 in the UK.
The table compares the percentage of males and females in the UK between the age of 15 and 75 in 2010.
As can be clearly seen, while the number of younger age group experienced a downward trend, the reverse was true for the other. There was also a shift in the figure for both genders.
In 1961, among over 36 million people, those aged 15 accounted for 1.86%, in which there were a little more females than males, at around 335,730 and 334,241 respectively. By 2011, the total number had seen a sharp reduction to 1.23%, followed by a slight decrease to 333,700 in the percentage of females despite a remarkable increase to 354,400 in males.
By contrast, the older age bracket witnessed a climb from a tiny proportion of 0.23% in 1961 to a high of 0.7% in 2011 due to an upsurge in the figures for both sexes. Particularly, the number of females recorded a four-fold increase to reach 210,100 after a significant decline from 254,900 in 1991. Likewise, male counterparts had also registered a gradual rise from 34,012 to peak at 181,300 by the end of the period.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-07-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
- The diagram below shows how oil is expected in use of production of perfume 84
- The maps below shows the museum s plant in 1998 and after some changes were made in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey SUmmarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- Some people say that success is 10 talent and 90 hard work Is hard work the key to success or is talent also important Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience 73
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emarkable increase to 354,400 in males. By contrast, the older age bracket witne...
^^^
Line 4, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ak at 181,300 by the end of the period.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60732984293 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62781331385 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612565445026 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5677820329 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354446308797 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137471476069 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138375156762 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223452782635 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151489407521 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.