The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
The table represents the changes of a number of students have attended four different schools (specialist, grammar voluntary- controlled and community schools) in a percentage from 2000 to 2009.
Overall, the proportion of pupils attending specialist, grammar and voluntary-controlled school declined, whereas the community schools experienced the growth in the percentage of students during the projected periods.
In terms of specialist, grammar and voluntary-controlled schools had experienced a decline with the students’ attending rates over the projected periods. Among all, the drastic plummet was recorded for voluntary-controlled schools which attendance rates dropped from 52% to 20% from 2000 to 2009. While grammar schools and specialist schools had declined from 24% and 12% respectively to 10% each in the same year.
In contrast to those, in terms of community college, which attendance rate was the lowest of 12% in 2000 but this rate increased drastically to reach at 32% in 2005 and by 2009, it recorded the highest attending rate of 58%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Đa Thiện | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Lia Bui | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | Jotdeep | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | harshiniharshini | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | anmol khipal | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 78
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014. 56
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology for outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 71
- The maps show the changed of Woodwards University spatial during 1985 until now. 84
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'whereas', 'while', 'in contrast', 'in contrast to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.294117647059 0.268076937826 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.122994652406 0.116061578633 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0427807486631 0.0759168565197 56% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0106951871658 0.0366838410393 29% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.00534759358289 0.0131127313244 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.155080213904 0.155750635184 100% => OK
Participles: 0.048128342246 0.0379272487307 127% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.49761695039 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0320855614973 0.0210936926555 152% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.106951871658 0.0948980150116 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106951871658 0.00967000014798 111% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1060.0 1161.00487805 91% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.9 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.58385093168 5.90752243213 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73763899035 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.416149068323 0.337110787985 123% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.372670807453 0.247514529752 151% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.260869565217 0.171178102325 152% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.192546583851 0.112407865282 171% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49761695039 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527950310559 0.546246751206 97% => OK
Word variations: 42.9141269943 49.3433353143 87% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 8.93414634146 67% => OK
Sentence length: 26.8333333333 23.0094962315 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3294489607 42.9750493124 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.666666667 135.714022679 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 23.0094962315 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 64.1004140787 47.7609492067 134% => OK
Elegance: 3.57692307692 2.94281807926 122% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35054086354 0.418131533498 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.269712173177 0.181151798455 149% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.15083999792 0.0850326197045 177% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.818456902046 0.706616315825 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.182638914454 0.157042692854 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214279549072 0.228904883108 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096599490491 0.108899403657 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.396613455507 0.367819155151 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0869975441853 0.0812612215331 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266559966131 0.316326947829 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074432780084 0.0921553760075 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.