The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
The table represents the changes of a number of students have attended four different schools (specialist, grammar voluntary- controlled and community schools) in a percentage from 2000 to 2009.
Overall, the proportion of pupils attending specialist, grammar and voluntary-controlled school declined, whereas the community schools experienced the growth in the percentage of students during the projected periods.
In terms of specialist, grammar and voluntary-controlled schools had experienced a decline with the students’ attending rates over the projected periods. Among all, the drastic plummet was recorded for voluntary-controlled schools which attendance rates dropped from 52% to 20% from 2000 to 2009. While grammar schools and specialist schools had declined from 24% and 12% respectively to 10% each in the same year.
In contrast to those, in terms of community college, which attendance rate was the lowest of 12% in 2000 but this rate increased drastically to reach at 32% in 2005 and by 2009, it recorded the highest attending rate of 58%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Đa Thiện | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Lia Bui | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | Jotdeep | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | harshiniharshini | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | anmol khipal | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows the import and export of Canada (values in $) from 1991 to 1995. 73
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 61
- The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an England town in 2012 50
- Some people believe that government should spend money on new building rather than renovating existing building To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The maps show the changed of Woodwards University spatial during 1985 until now. 84
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'whereas', 'while', 'in contrast', 'in contrast to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.294117647059 0.268076937826 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.122994652406 0.116061578633 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0427807486631 0.0759168565197 56% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0106951871658 0.0366838410393 29% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.00534759358289 0.0131127313244 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.155080213904 0.155750635184 100% => OK
Participles: 0.048128342246 0.0379272487307 127% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.49761695039 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0320855614973 0.0210936926555 152% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.106951871658 0.0948980150116 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106951871658 0.00967000014798 111% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1060.0 1161.00487805 91% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.9 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.58385093168 5.90752243213 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73763899035 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.416149068323 0.337110787985 123% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.372670807453 0.247514529752 151% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.260869565217 0.171178102325 152% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.192546583851 0.112407865282 171% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49761695039 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527950310559 0.546246751206 97% => OK
Word variations: 42.9141269943 49.3433353143 87% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 8.93414634146 67% => OK
Sentence length: 26.8333333333 23.0094962315 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3294489607 42.9750493124 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.666666667 135.714022679 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 23.0094962315 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 64.1004140787 47.7609492067 134% => OK
Elegance: 3.57692307692 2.94281807926 122% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35054086354 0.418131533498 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.269712173177 0.181151798455 149% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.15083999792 0.0850326197045 177% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.818456902046 0.706616315825 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.182638914454 0.157042692854 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214279549072 0.228904883108 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096599490491 0.108899403657 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.396613455507 0.367819155151 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0869975441853 0.0812612215331 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266559966131 0.316326947829 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074432780084 0.0921553760075 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.