The table shows the tourist numbers and tourist spending in five countries in 2012 and 2013. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table shows the tourist numbers and tourist spending in five countries in 2012 and 2013. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given table illustrates the number of visitors and the amount of money they spent on touring in five different countries in two distinct years 2012 and 2013.

From a general perspective, France had to highest traveler numbers while vacationers spent the most money in the USA over the span given.

It is striking that France was the most popular destination and it attracted a 84,7 million people in 2013. In contrast, people paid $56.1 million for touring in France which was the third highest among five countries given.Moreover, the USA earned the most money in tourist expenditure with $139.6 million in 2013 doubling Spain’s figure and tripling Italy’s.Beside, the number of people going to China saw a slight decrease of 2 million holidaymakers whereas the amount of money allocating for traveling increased to $51.7 million 2013

In addition both traveler numbers and budget on visiting to Italy were the lowest.The figure for visitors and their expense in Spain witnessed a gradual rise of 3.2 million people and $4.1 million in order

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-20 Hoaimy 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
... From a general perspective, France had to highest traveler numbers while vacationers spen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...st popular destination and it attracted a 84,7 million people in 2013. In contras...
^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...hird highest among five countries given.Moreover, the USA earned the most money in touri...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Beside
...apos;s figure and tripling Italy's.Beside, the number of people going to China sa...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ling increased to 1.7 million 2013 In addition both traveler numbers and budget on vis...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...et on visiting to Italy were the lowest.The figure for visitors and their expense i...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, third, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13372093023 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92827084574 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 22.4926829268 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 219.07532951 43.030603864 509% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 220.75 112.824112599 196% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.0 22.9334400587 187% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.25 5.23603664747 291% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125082392614 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811174619119 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610075485675 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080873407688 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638536067198 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.2 13.2329268293 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.29 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 10.3012195122 183% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.9970731707 175% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.