The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables illustrate how fairtrade coffee and bananas were sold in five European countries in 1999 and 2004. Overall, it is clear that sales of coffee in all the sampled places experienced an increase during the five years; also a rise could be seen in those of bananas in the majority of countries except Sweden and Denmark.
Starting with the coffee sales, there was an obvious growth in the UK, from 1.5 million euros in 1999 to 20 million euros in 2004. Meanwhile, the data in Switzerland was doubled from 3 million euros to 6 million euros, and the figures for both Denmark and Sweden increased by the same million euros(0.2), from 1.8 to 2 and from 0.8 to 1 respectively.
Turning now to banana sales, Switzerland, at 15 million euros, sold the largest number among the five in 1999 and then its figure rose to 47 million euros in 2004, which still remain the biggest number. The five years also witnessed a moderate rise in the UK (from 1 to 5.5 million euros) and Belgium (from 0.6 to 4 million euros). However, the sales of bananas experienced a decrease in Sweden (1.8—1 million euros) and Denmark (2—0.9 million euros.)
- nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- In many countries, there are more people choosing to live by themselves than before. What are the reasons of this situation? Is it positive or negative to the development of society? 73
- Fossil fuels(e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative effect? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44245777855 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7098212106 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.857142857 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160986217878 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104512385338 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968379030096 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134798342415 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092162566164 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.