The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1997 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables below compare amount of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas ‘sales in five countries in two different years include of 1999 and 2004.
The first table display information about consumption of coffee in five countries namely, UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden while the other one shows the bananas which were sold in the mentioned countries in 1999 and 2004.
According to the first table, in comparison to other countries, UK experienced a sharp increase in sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee in 2004 (20 million of euros) when Sweden and Denmark both, together have enjoyed a slight increase (1 million of euros -2 millions of euros) which can give good clue about these market to the relevance investor.
The data provided by second table express clearly that Switzerland in both identified years was best market for bananas in regard to other, also, it should be noted that its consumption in this country increased sharply whereas other countries such as UK and Belgium have an increase in 2004 in compare of 1999 but not as sharp as Switzerland. Along with this, the two remained countries exceptionally had a imperceptible decrease in amount of bananas were sold in 2004 in regard to 1999.
To wrap it up, in my personal viewpoint, Sweden and Denmark had not good market for Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in both years.
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1997 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- the chart below shows the different levels of post school qualification in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 67
- Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...yed a slight increase 1 million of euros -2 millions of euros which can give good...
^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llions of euros which can give good clue about these market to the relevance inve...
^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the best'.
Suggestion: was the best
...at Switzerland in both identified years was best market for bananas in regard to other,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oth identified years was best market for bananas in regard to other, also, it sho...
^^
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...wo remained countries exceptionally had a imperceptible decrease in amount of ban...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, whereas, while, such as, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14349775785 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03765902599 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538116591928 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.7620310723 43.030603864 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 191.166666667 112.824112599 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.1666666667 22.9334400587 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 5.23603664747 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304119659286 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162365014391 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896767089922 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185175197744 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813509537772 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.