The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.
The given table lists compare alteration in the sales of Fairtrad*-labelled tea and pineapples in five European nations in two various years (2010,2015). Unit measurement was in millions of euros.
A quick look at the tabular two charts is quite enough to make it clear that the consumption of tea and pineapples was maximum in Austria in 2010 and again at top position five years later.
In the analisation of tea sales in 2010 and in 2015, Austria and Germany were attained first two ranks in 2010 consecutively with 4 and 2.8 millions of euros. However, in 2015, France gained top one place with 21 millions of euros and Austria tea sales became double (8 millions of euros) in this year as compare to 2010. Surprisingly, marginal change was seen in tea sales between the gap of five years in both Netherlands and Norway.
In comparison, with tea sales, the pineapple sales pattern was completely unique, Austria and Germany were first two main region which had big hand in pineapples flourishment in 2010.This two countries had contributed 16 and 3 millions of euros in nations economy respectively. After five year, there was three fold surgement in pineapple sales in both Austria and France. In contrary, in similar the time period, only Norway sales were slip back through o.8 millions of euros.
- The table below gives information about a restaurant's average sales in three different branches in 2016. 61
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between june and september 2013. 78
- The chart below gives the distribution of worldwide car schemes in 2008 and 2016 89
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of jounal articles read per week by all students, phD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university. 61
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in canada in 2005 and 2010. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
...anks in 2010 consecutively with 4 and 2.8 millions of euros. However, in 2015, France gained ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '21 million'.
Suggestion: 21 million
... 2015, France gained top one place with 21 millions of euros and Austria tea sales became doub...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
...ros and Austria tea sales became double 8 millions of euros in this year as compare to 2010. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'region' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'regions'.
Suggestion: regions
...Austria and Germany were first two main region which had big hand in pineapples flouri...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...hand in pineapples flourishment in 2010.This two countries had contributed 16 and 3 ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
...is two countries had contributed 16 and 3 millions of euros in nations economy respectively. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 458, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
...y Norway sales were slip back through o.8 millions of euros.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90950226244 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78261780628 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533936651584 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.957559681 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.555555556 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291335109891 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138284382053 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117896681898 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210838437391 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100200306843 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.